16:9 ASPECT RATIOS THE GODFATHER PC PC
This could be even more of a problem for your PC based DVD player. Two interlaced fields in the same frame are displayed one after the other, to give the illusion of the vertical resolution being twice the native resolution. The native resolution for the "1024x1024" ALIS screen used by Fujitsu and Hitachi is actually 1024x512. ALIS means Alternate LIghting of Surfaces. "1024x1024") is that they are the only plasma screens that interlace. What may also prove a challenge with an ALIS plasma screen (i.e. The higher the resolution, the better the scaling, and 1024x1024 is pretty much state of the art (I believe). And so it becomes a question of what is most acceptable - the pixel edges, or the clarity/fidelity. But the drawback of scaling upwards is that you will lose some sharpness/clarity.
In either case 1024x1024 is higher than 720x480, and so the results should look good. As a test, you could try sending the plasma a 720x480p signal, and comparing the results with a computer-scaled 1024x1024 image. The reason for doing the scaling in the computer (instead of in the plasma display) is that the computer has access to the raw digital information, whereas the display is only receving an analog signal (which it then must convert to digital for scaling and display). a monitor/plasma), the graphics card will scale the image to the higher resolution - and will use all the available resolution to smooth out the pixel edges. When you playback a DVD on a high resolution display (eg. Using a higher resolution, pixels become less noticeable. But the problem with 480 lines is that you may be able to discern the pixels during normal viewing. A DVD has 480 lines, and so an ideal display resolution might be 480 lines. A more important factor is the resolution, in relation to the source material. Rectangle pixels are quite common on CRT displays (ironically to improve resolution and quality). rectangle pixels" discussion, it probably doesn't matter because the plasma has rectangle pixels by design, and an ideal pixel would be round anyway (because the real world isn't comprised of square pixels).
16:9 ASPECT RATIOS THE GODFATHER PC MANUAL
Nowadays most players handle anamorphic/non-anamorphic/ letterboxed/4:3/2.35 material correctly - without any manual intervention needed - the software provides black bars (horizontally or vertically) when needed.Īs to the "square pixels vs. The DVD player software needs to be configured for a 16x9 display. So what you want to do, is send it a 1024x1024 resolution image - because then it won't be scaled in either direction. It seems unlikely that the designers would make it scale a 1024x768 signal to 768x1024 pixels, but instead would just display it as 1024x1024 (occupying the whole 16:9 screen - and stretching the desktop horizontally). it would scaler the image *horizontally* to 768 pixels (discarding some information horizontally). In this case, the scaler would center the image, and provide black bars on the edges - ie. But I wouldn't expect it to scale in the horizontal axis - unless the display's scaler assumed that the pixels needed to be square (ie. Given that this 16:9 display has 1024x1024 pixels, I would imagine that if you fed it a 1024x768 signal, the display would have to scale in the vertical axis (because 768 is less than 1024).